Reaction to the passing of the Investigatory Powers Bill
18 November 2016
The International and European Federation of Journalists, (IFJ) and (EFJ), joined the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), in strongly condemning the UK's Investigatory Powers Bill, which threatens the right to privacy, freedom of expression and investigative journalism, giving the government sweeping spying powers.
The new law gives the UK one of the most extreme spying powers in the developed world whose impact will be felt around the world.
Read Michelle Stanistreet's comment for Left Foot Forward, published today, in reaction to the passing of the Investigatory Powers Bill.
Under the "national security" pretext, the bill, which was passed by the House of Lords on 15 November will force internet and phone companies to store their users’ browsing data for a year and provide them to the government. The bill also enables the authorities to access citizens’ telephone calls and emails, documents, diaries, contact books, photographs, messaging chat logs and GPS location records, including login details and passwords.
There will be no way of opting out and the data will be collected on everyone, without regard to innocence, guilt or consent, with the extra risks of data stealing and leaking.
The IFJ and EFJ have backed the NUJ and its campaign against this "unjustified and draconian" legislation.
"The bill is an attack on democracy and on the public’s right to know and it enables unjustified, secret, state interference in the press," said the NUJ in a statement.
"The government has argued the bill is about dealing with national security and serious crime but what they have actually done is use terrorism as an excuse to give themselves new powers to spy on journalists."
The bill lacks sufficient safeguards for sources and whistleblowers and is an unprecedented attack on long-established and legally upheld commitments to the vital need to protect them. In addition, the lack of protection for sources has an impact on journalists working in war zones or those investigating organised crime or state misconduct.
The lack of protections in law make journalists less safe – if a journalist is perceived as an informer, or as a future witness in a trial, then they can become a target.
"If this bill is passed into law then we expect and will support legal challenges to it" added the NUJ.
IFJ president, Philippe Leruth, said:
"We join our colleagues in the UK in condemning this bill which enables unjustified state interference in journalism and investigative reporting and exposes journalistic sources and whistleblowers.
"Under this bill, the state would have no obligation to contact a journalist or media organisation when they access the information stored, preventing our colleagues to uphold the ethical code of conduct enshrining the principle to protect sources."
EFJ president, Mogens Blicher Bjerregård, added:
"The United Kingdom is pretending to protect its citizens by imposing this massive surveillance, but it will rather undermine their privacy and their right to information since it will also undoubtedly damage the way journalists work. National security should not interfere with journalistic sources."
OSCE representative on freedom of the media, Dunja Mijatović, also condemned the bill:
"This measure allows law enforcement agencies to monitor journalists’ IT and communication equipment following approval by the Home Secretary and without judicial oversight."
Despite criticism from almost every major technology and internet company such as Apple and Twitter, the legislation has received little opposition in parliament. The IFJ and EFJ have submitted this case to the Council of Europe’s platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists, as they did with a similar legislation in Germany.